Comments on: Mike Phillips on WXLO 99x New York | January 1974 (6:22) http://airchexx.com/markets/new-york/mike-phillips-on-wxlo-99x-new-york-january-1974-622-scoped Where Classic Radio Lives Wed, 17 Mar 2010 13:17:26 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: BobBJB http://airchexx.com/markets/new-york/mike-phillips-on-wxlo-99x-new-york-january-1974-622-scoped/comment-page-1#comment-12186 BobBJB Mon, 24 Dec 2007 04:10:32 +0000 http://airchexx.com/?p=125#comment-12186 WXLO used the ID "99XLO" for only a matter of weeks. They were transitioning to high energy "99X" and I remember, as a teenager, thinking that they had actually changed frequency from 98.7 to 99.1 -- initially not knowing that they were just rounding it up. WXLO used the ID “99XLO” for only a matter of weeks. They were transitioning to high energy “99X” and I remember, as a teenager, thinking that they had actually changed frequency from 98.7 to 99.1 — initially not knowing that they were just rounding it up.

]]> By: Steve West http://airchexx.com/markets/new-york/mike-phillips-on-wxlo-99x-new-york-january-1974-622-scoped/comment-page-1#comment-290 Steve West Mon, 06 Dec 2004 03:03:12 +0000 http://airchexx.com/?p=125#comment-290 Um... webmaster goofed. Sorry, I was putting up the tree while doing the site. Maybe I should stick to one thing at a time LOL... Sorry bout that. All fixed! Um… webmaster goofed. Sorry, I was putting up the tree while doing the site. Maybe I should stick to one thing at a time LOL…

Sorry bout that. All fixed!

]]> By: bar http://airchexx.com/markets/new-york/mike-phillips-on-wxlo-99x-new-york-january-1974-622-scoped/comment-page-1#comment-289 bar Mon, 06 Dec 2004 01:06:03 +0000 http://airchexx.com/?p=125#comment-289 am I missign it, or is there no link provided to actually invoke (listen) to this aircheck? am I missign it, or is there no link provided to actually invoke (listen) to this aircheck?

]]>